Skip to content
BiologicalX

Comparison

CJC-1295 vs Ipamorelin

Side-by-side of CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin. Every row below is pulled from the compound schema and will update as our data grows. For deeper reads, follow through to each compound page.

Effects at a glance

CJC-1295

  • GHRH analog that binds the GHRH receptor on pituitary somatotrophs to release endogenous GH
  • DAC variant has ~7 day half-life via albumin binding; non-DAC variant ~30 minutes
  • Teichman 2006 trial showed sustained 2 to 10 fold IGF-1 elevation at 60 to 250 mcg/kg DAC dosing
  • Anecdotal protocols pair non-DAC CJC-1295 with Ipamorelin to mimic pulsatile GH release
  • Side effects: water retention, numbness or tingling at injection site, vivid dreams, transient flushing
  • No completed phase III RCTs; research-use-only and not FDA approved

Ipamorelin

  • Pentapeptide GHS-R1a agonist with the cleanest selectivity profile in the GHRP class
  • Minimal cortisol and prolactin elevation at standard doses (substantially less than GHRP-2 or hexarelin)
  • ~2 hour plasma half-life, longest of the synthetic GHRPs
  • Largest human safety database (~600 participants in Helsinn's postoperative ileus phase 2)
  • Standard pairing for CJC-1295 no-DAC at 200 to 300 mcg subcutaneously 2 to 3 times daily
  • Banned by WADA under S2; never reached registration despite phase 2b development

Side-by-side

Attribute CJC-1295 Ipamorelin
Category peptide peptide
Also known as CJC-1295 DAC, CJC-1295 no-DAC, Mod GRF 1-29, tesamorelin analog NNC 26-0161, Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
Half-life (hr) 168 2
Typical dose (mg) 0.1 0.2
Dosing frequency weekly (DAC); 1-3x daily (non-DAC) 2-3x daily
Routes subcutaneous subcutaneous, intravenous
Onset (hr) 1 0.25
Peak (hr) 3 1
Molecular weight 3367.83 711.86
Molecular formula C152H252N44O42 C38H49N9O5
Mechanism Binds the GHRH receptor on pituitary somatotrophs, stimulating pulsatile growth-hormone release. The DAC modification extends plasma residence by tethering the peptide to serum albumin via a maleimide-cysteine bond. Selective GHS-R1a agonist that stimulates pulsatile GH release with minimal cortisol or prolactin co-activation. Suppresses hypothalamic somatostatin and stimulates pituitary somatotrophs.
Legal status Not FDA approved; research-use-only grey market; banned by WADA Not FDA approved; advanced through phase 2b in postoperative ileus before discontinuation; research-use-only grey market; banned by WADA
WADA status banned banned
DEA / Rx Not FDA approved; not scheduled; research-chemical status Not scheduled (research chemical)
Pregnancy Insufficient data; not recommended Insufficient data; not recommended
CAS 446262-90-4 170851-70-4
PubChem CID 91971820 11338566
Wikidata Q5012154 Q1666741

Safety profile

CJC-1295

Common side effects

  • injection-site reactions
  • water retention
  • numbness or tingling at injection site
  • vivid dreams
  • transient flushing
  • head pressure or mild headache

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • active malignancy
  • diabetic retinopathy (theoretical)
  • history of pituitary tumor

Interactions

  • Ipamorelin: synergistic GH release; commonly co-administered in anecdotal protocols(minor)
  • insulin: GH-induced insulin resistance can shift glycemic control over weeks(moderate)
  • corticosteroids: blunt GH-axis response; reduce expected efficacy(moderate)

Ipamorelin

Common side effects

  • injection-site irritation
  • vivid dreams
  • transient mild head pressure
  • occasional headache

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • active malignancy
  • history of pituitary tumor
  • uncontrolled diabetes

Interactions

  • CJC-1295: synergistic GH release via parallel GHRH and ghrelin pathways; standard pairing(minor)
  • sermorelin: additive GH release; functionally similar pairing to CJC-1295 with shorter GHRH half-life(minor)
  • insulin: sustained GH can blunt insulin sensitivity over weeks(moderate)
  • corticosteroids: blunt GH response; reduce expected efficacy(moderate)

Which Should You Take?

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin score evenly on the criteria we weight (goal breadth, legal accessibility, evidence depth). The conditionals below should drive the decision more than any aggregate score.

  • If your priority is growth-hormone axis, pick CJC-1295.
  • If your priority is body composition, pick CJC-1295.
  • If your priority is growth-hormone axis, pick Ipamorelin.
  • If your priority is body composition, pick Ipamorelin.

Edge case: Half-lives differ materially (CJC-1295 ~168 hr vs Ipamorelin ~2 hr). CJC-1295 reaches steady state faster; Ipamorelin is easier to dial in if tolerability is uncertain.

Default choice: either is defensible. CJC-1295 edges out on goal breadth + legal accessibility; Ipamorelin is the right call if your priority sits in the goals listed above.

This verdict is generated from each compound's schema (goals, legal status, evidence outcomes, dosing route). It updates automatically as our compound data evolves; the deeper read sits on each individual compound page.

Common questions

What is the difference between CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin?

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin differ in category (peptide vs peptide), mechanism, and typical dosing. See the side-by-side table for full details.

Which has a longer half-life, CJC-1295 or Ipamorelin?

CJC-1295 half-life is 168 hours; Ipamorelin half-life is 2 hours.

Can you stack CJC-1295 with Ipamorelin?

Stack compatibility depends on mechanism overlap, legal status, and individual response. Check each compound page for specific interactions and contraindications before combining.

Go deeper