Skip to content
BiologicalX

Comparison

CJC-1295 vs TB-500

Side-by-side of CJC-1295 and TB-500. Every row below is pulled from the compound schema and will update as our data grows. For deeper reads, follow through to each compound page.

Effects at a glance

CJC-1295

  • GHRH analog that binds the GHRH receptor on pituitary somatotrophs to release endogenous GH
  • DAC variant has ~7 day half-life via albumin binding; non-DAC variant ~30 minutes
  • Teichman 2006 trial showed sustained 2 to 10 fold IGF-1 elevation at 60 to 250 mcg/kg DAC dosing
  • Anecdotal protocols pair non-DAC CJC-1295 with Ipamorelin to mimic pulsatile GH release
  • Side effects: water retention, numbness or tingling at injection site, vivid dreams, transient flushing
  • No completed phase III RCTs; research-use-only and not FDA approved

TB-500

  • 17-amino-acid fragment of endogenous Thymosin Beta-4, an actin-sequestering peptide
  • Preclinical models show accelerated tendon, ligament, and dermal wound healing
  • Equine veterinary use for soft-tissue injury is the most documented real-world application
  • Anecdotal human protocols use 2 to 5 mg twice weekly subcutaneously for 4 to 6 weeks
  • WADA banned under S2 (peptide hormones, growth factors) since 2018
  • No completed phase II or III human RCTs as of 2026; long-term safety unestablished

Side-by-side

Attribute CJC-1295 TB-500
Category peptide peptide
Also known as CJC-1295 DAC, CJC-1295 no-DAC, Mod GRF 1-29, tesamorelin analog Thymosin Beta-4 fragment, TB4-Frag, Thymosin Beta 4
Half-life (hr) 168 2
Typical dose (mg) 0.1 2.5
Dosing frequency weekly (DAC); 1-3x daily (non-DAC) 2x weekly (anecdotal protocols)
Routes subcutaneous subcutaneous, intramuscular
Onset (hr) 1 -
Peak (hr) 3 -
Molecular weight 3367.83 4963.4
Molecular formula C152H252N44O42 C212H350N56O78S
Mechanism Binds the GHRH receptor on pituitary somatotrophs, stimulating pulsatile growth-hormone release. The DAC modification extends plasma residence by tethering the peptide to serum albumin via a maleimide-cysteine bond. Sequesters G-actin monomers, modulates cell migration and angiogenesis, and upregulates VEGF and myosin transcription. Promotes endothelial differentiation and stem-cell migration to injury sites in preclinical models.
Legal status Not FDA approved; research-use-only grey market; banned by WADA Not FDA approved; research-use-only grey market; banned by WADA
WADA status banned banned
DEA / Rx Not FDA approved; not scheduled; research-chemical status Not FDA approved; not scheduled; research-chemical status
Pregnancy Insufficient data; not recommended Insufficient data
CAS 446262-90-4 885340-08-9
PubChem CID 91971820 62707662
Wikidata Q5012154 Q7799921

Safety profile

CJC-1295

Common side effects

  • injection-site reactions
  • water retention
  • numbness or tingling at injection site
  • vivid dreams
  • transient flushing
  • head pressure or mild headache

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • active malignancy
  • diabetic retinopathy (theoretical)
  • history of pituitary tumor

Interactions

  • Ipamorelin: synergistic GH release; commonly co-administered in anecdotal protocols(minor)
  • insulin: GH-induced insulin resistance can shift glycemic control over weeks(moderate)
  • corticosteroids: blunt GH-axis response; reduce expected efficacy(moderate)

TB-500

Common side effects

  • injection-site irritation
  • fatigue (anecdotal)
  • lethargy in early dosing (anecdotal)

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • active malignancy (theoretical angiogenic concern)
  • no established human safety profile

Interactions

  • BPC-157: Frequently co-administered in anecdotal healing protocols; no controlled interaction data(minor)

Which Should You Take?

CJC-1295 comes out ahead for most readers on the criteria we weight: 3 catalogued goals, research-only / gray-market sourcing, with a Tier-B outcome catalogued. TB-500 is the right call when one of the conditionals below applies.

  • If your priority is growth-hormone axis, pick CJC-1295.
  • If your priority is body composition, pick CJC-1295.
  • If your priority is tendon repair, pick TB-500.
  • If your priority is wound healing, pick TB-500.

Edge case: Half-lives differ materially (CJC-1295 ~168 hr vs TB-500 ~2 hr). CJC-1295 reaches steady state faster; TB-500 is easier to dial in if tolerability is uncertain.

Default choice: CJC-1295. Wider use case, and broader goal coverage. Reach for TB-500 only if your priority sits squarely in the goals it owns above.

This verdict is generated from each compound's schema (goals, legal status, evidence outcomes, dosing route). It updates automatically as our compound data evolves; the deeper read sits on each individual compound page.

Common questions

What is the difference between CJC-1295 and TB-500?

CJC-1295 and TB-500 differ in category (peptide vs peptide), mechanism, and typical dosing. See the side-by-side table for full details.

Which has a longer half-life, CJC-1295 or TB-500?

CJC-1295 half-life is 168 hours; TB-500 half-life is 2 hours.

Can you stack CJC-1295 with TB-500?

Stack compatibility depends on mechanism overlap, legal status, and individual response. Check each compound page for specific interactions and contraindications before combining.

Go deeper