Skip to content
BiologicalX

Comparison

Semax vs TB-500

Side-by-side of Semax and TB-500. Every row below is pulled from the compound schema and will update as our data grows. For deeper reads, follow through to each compound page.

Effects at a glance

Semax

  • Synthetic heptapeptide analog of ACTH(4-10) developed in Russia in the 1980s
  • Approved in Russia for ischemic stroke, cognitive impairment, and cerebrovascular disorders
  • Lacks the corticotropic activity of native ACTH due to the Pro-Gly-Pro stabilizing tail
  • Russian RCTs report improved cognitive recovery in acute ischemic stroke versus standard care
  • Modulates BDNF and NGF expression and dopaminergic signaling in preclinical models
  • Standard route is intranasal; not FDA approved; research-use-only outside Russia

TB-500

  • 17-amino-acid fragment of endogenous Thymosin Beta-4, an actin-sequestering peptide
  • Preclinical models show accelerated tendon, ligament, and dermal wound healing
  • Equine veterinary use for soft-tissue injury is the most documented real-world application
  • Anecdotal human protocols use 2 to 5 mg twice weekly subcutaneously for 4 to 6 weeks
  • WADA banned under S2 (peptide hormones, growth factors) since 2018
  • No completed phase II or III human RCTs as of 2026; long-term safety unestablished

Side-by-side

Attribute Semax TB-500
Category peptide peptide
Also known as Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro, ACTH(4-10) Pro-Gly-Pro analog Thymosin Beta-4 fragment, TB4-Frag, Thymosin Beta 4
Half-life (hr) 0.5 2
Typical dose (mg) 0.6 2.5
Dosing frequency 2-3x daily (intranasal) 2x weekly (anecdotal protocols)
Routes intranasal subcutaneous, intramuscular
Onset (hr) 0.5 -
Peak (hr) 2 -
Molecular weight 813.94 4963.4
Molecular formula C37H51N9O10S C212H350N56O78S
Mechanism Modulates BDNF and NGF expression in hippocampus and cortex, enhances dopaminergic and serotonergic signaling, and reduces oxidative stress markers in preclinical ischemia models. Lacks corticotropic activity of native ACTH. Sequesters G-actin monomers, modulates cell migration and angiogenesis, and upregulates VEGF and myosin transcription. Promotes endothelial differentiation and stem-cell migration to injury sites in preclinical models.
Legal status Approved in Russia for stroke and cognitive disorders; not FDA approved; research-use-only grey market elsewhere Not FDA approved; research-use-only grey market; banned by WADA
WADA status unknown banned
DEA / Rx Not FDA approved; not scheduled; research-chemical status outside Russia Not FDA approved; not scheduled; research-chemical status
Pregnancy Not recommended; insufficient data Insufficient data
CAS 80714-61-0 885340-08-9
PubChem CID 9811102 62707662
Wikidata Q4413083 Q7799921

Safety profile

Semax

Common side effects

  • mild nasal irritation
  • transient mild headache
  • rare mild euphoria or activation

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • acute psychotic disorder
  • severe hypertension (caution due to mild activating effect)

Interactions

  • stimulants (caffeine, amphetamines): potential additive activation; monitor for overstimulation(minor)
  • antipsychotics: theoretical antagonism via dopaminergic modulation(minor)

TB-500

Common side effects

  • injection-site irritation
  • fatigue (anecdotal)
  • lethargy in early dosing (anecdotal)

Contraindications

  • pregnancy
  • active malignancy (theoretical angiogenic concern)
  • no established human safety profile

Interactions

  • BPC-157: Frequently co-administered in anecdotal healing protocols; no controlled interaction data(minor)

Which Should You Take?

Semax and TB-500 score evenly on the criteria we weight (goal breadth, legal accessibility, evidence depth). The conditionals below should drive the decision more than any aggregate score.

  • If your priority is focus or working memory, pick Semax.
  • If your priority is long-term neuroprotection, pick Semax.
  • If your priority is post-training recovery, pick TB-500.
  • If your priority is tendon repair, pick TB-500.

Edge case: Half-lives differ materially (Semax ~0.5 hr vs TB-500 ~2 hr). TB-500 reaches steady state faster; Semax is easier to dial in if tolerability is uncertain.

Default choice: either is defensible. Semax edges out on goal breadth + legal accessibility; TB-500 is the right call if your priority sits in the goals listed above.

This verdict is generated from each compound's schema (goals, legal status, evidence outcomes, dosing route). It updates automatically as our compound data evolves; the deeper read sits on each individual compound page.

Common questions

What is the difference between Semax and TB-500?

Semax and TB-500 differ in category (peptide vs peptide), mechanism, and typical dosing. See the side-by-side table for full details.

Which has a longer half-life, Semax or TB-500?

Semax half-life is 0.5 hours; TB-500 half-life is 2 hours.

Can you stack Semax with TB-500?

Stack compatibility depends on mechanism overlap, legal status, and individual response. Check each compound page for specific interactions and contraindications before combining.

Go deeper